Logistics at a Crossroads: 🎙️Volume 47 The Acronyms That Decide Who Gets the Blame
Every industry has acronyms.
Logistics has a lot of them.
On the surface, they’re efficient. Time-saving. Necessary. But acronyms aren’t neutral. They shape power, access, and accountability in ways we rarely examine.
Acronyms decide who’s “in the know.”
They separate fluency from exclusion.
They signal who belongs—and who should already understand.
When everything is running smoothly, acronyms feel harmless.
When something goes wrong, they become something else.
Suddenly, responsibility compresses into shorthand.
Context disappears.
Ownership blurs.
A missed ETA becomes a personal failure instead of a system gap.
A misunderstood SOP turns into a performance issue.
And the question quietly shifts from what broke to who didn’t keep up.
This isn’t about eliminating acronyms. It’s about recognizing when they clarify—and when they protect.
Because when language becomes a shield, accountability stops being shared and starts being selective.
The people closest to the work are often the ones expected to decode, absorb, and carry the consequences—while the system remains unnamed.
Words don’t just describe logistics.
They distribute responsibility.
And if we don’t examine how we use them, they’ll keep deciding who gets blamed—long before anyone says it out loud.
Comments
Post a Comment